Talk:Flamen Quirinalis

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yesterday night the software was unable to save my article for loss of session data. After spending half an hour trying again I had to resort to save it on the PC, but when copied again on the Wiki page this caused problems with the references type and numbering. I tried to fix it but for now the result is not optimal. I apologise to the reader. Moreover as I copied the article directly the index of content box does not show. I shall ask the help desk for advice.Aldrasto (talk) 04:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the references. If by "the index of content box" you mean the table of contents it automatically will appear on any page with more than three section headers so it doesn't appear here. However, if you want it to appear anywayt, you can force it by added to the page __FORCETOC__ (that's two underscores on either side of the word). Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 05:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much obligedAldrasto (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

Shouldn't this be moved back to Flamen quirinalis over the redirect? The article uses flamen quirinalis throughout so if that is standard practice, title should be Flamen quirinalis as we use sentence case for titles. – ukexpat (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

to the readers

The article is now more or less completed. I am aware that my English is far from perfect and apologise to readers about that. I welcome corrections of mistaskes and misproprieties as well as suggestions about alterations to improve its lamguage.Aldrasto (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]